Comments

Displaying 22251 to 22275 of 32859 Comments
[+] Richard S Bean on PETIT v. DALE ADAMS ENTERPRISES
I just seen this so ask what happend to me when i was to be his partner.
[+] Doris Williams on PRICE v. STATE
I worked with Sean Price after he served time in prison at Roper Corporation in Lafayette.
[+] Marie Friquegnon on YAEGER v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
I need to enter the class action suit for my Subaru Forester 20012
[+] Edward H on BARRY v. HALITSKY
We are the Defendants / Appellants (Pro-Se) in the above case. We signed a 7-month Airbnb apartment lease and paid ~$3,000 in total rent. But the Landlord cancelled our release early without reason and did NOT serve required Notice to Quit. Springfield Judge Dina E. Fein accepted the Landlord's fraudulent documents and evicted us. Then Boston Appeals Court Judges covered-up fraud. They ignored our Appeals Brief with 17 exhibits (100 pages) but claimed we provided an insufficient record. They disregarded violations of Massachusetts Laws. We were financially ruined and became homeless. The Supreme Justice Court denied to review our case without any explanation.
[+] Margarita Martinez on DURAN v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Hi my name is Margarita Martinez I did not receive any papers how do I go about this 2040 Howe Street Racine Wisconsin 53403
[+] David Sewell on VISTA HEALTHPLAN, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC.
Dear Mitchell Goldberg: I have read through most of this case and admire your technical clarity of citations a lot. You inherited "The Case from Hell" and I can only imagine you cannot wait for July 25 so you can be rid of this Frankenstein. But, with sincere respect, I wish to offer two points: (1) I think you lost your way by allowing technical definitions to favor the Defendants, thus allowing the over-arching truth of this case to escape your vision: that the Defendants are price-gouging criminals who caused millions of Americans to suffer the pains of wide-spectrum narcolepsy and daytime tiredness due to low-income. This great truth became lost in all of your rulings. I realize it is popular to say that yours "is not a Court of Justice--it is a Court of Law". Yes, but at the Federal Circuit Court level you are empowered to make interpretations that "lean" towards the People and away from those who have broken the law. (2) You and your Court were IMPERSONATED by the Def.'s. Crimne?
[+] Laraine Agren on SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PACIFIC WEST CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
I lost my investment with Pacific West Capitol Group. Can anyone help me. It was for $25,000.
[+] William Stoddard on STATE v. MOORE
The details in this report are not accurate, I knew both the victim, the suspects and Bobby Moore and the owner of the stolen car was my mothers. Details of this report are inaccurate. Initially, Bobby was pulled over by Officer Feldner, for driving without headlights at night.
[+] Flo Williams on STEWART EX REL. H.S. v. 231st JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
I don't feel this case should have been denied, because after viewing public records, the mother received a Bench warrant in retaliation for mother filing on Judge. Revenge is clear and should be investigated. This mother need to watch her back, that judge could cause her much harm. Didn't she suppose to have a different judge? This case is shady.
[+] Matt Kirk on SCHULTZ v. KRAUSE
The use of the term "on the face" by ORDER via Judge MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., was a qualifier statement to dismiss case frequently and a act to further other crimes that the willfully committed "Contempt of Court against the Court" and used the "on the face" as a way to mock an ADA Act victim and tbd murder victim (Kirk Schultz) as part of the RICO Fraud(s) MILKS-A, MILKS-B, MILKS-C and GIMMS - the acts of Kimberly Guilfoyle and Newt Gingrich were used to bribed/create undue influence on Judge England to create bias and cover up the crimes of Nationwide Insurance and participants in the media and medical RICO frauds... the Judge is a CRIMINAL and should be in jail...
[+] Micki jay (Kosman) on COOPER v. UNION BANK
So, after the divorce, I bought an old farmhouse in Maine. Union Bank served papers upon me and I paid them $3,500.00. Why ? Was I liable for Bruce's debt after divorcing him? I have read this decision and it seems plaintiffs prevailed.
[+] Ilene Healy on IN MATTER OF RESNICK
My brother when i needed help. Would not do one thing.he is pompous. I suggest. Never use him . Not out of Revenge. He cares only about money and prestige
[+] John Smith on VENHAUS v. STATE
Mike - easy for you to say seeing that a member of your family wasn't murdered.
[+] Carlos Vasquez on SALUD NATURAL ENTREPRENEUR, INC. v. NUTRICENTRO INTERNACIONAL, INC.
"Fraud upon of the court "The 7 th stated a "decision produced by Fraud upon the Court not in essence a decision at All and never became Final" This is a Fraud 8 years In District court of Chicago
[+] Lucy wangari kahuni on SINGH v. V. PATEL & SONS, INC.
what was the holding of this case
[+] Joe schembri on U.S. v. VALLECORSA
Did Vallecorsa spend anytime in jail. How about the Kelly's what was their sentence.
[+] Michael B Dorsey on DORSEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUPERIOR COURT
As plaintiff in this case I can say that the defendant does not live in D C. The court refused to allow action in the case as enunciated in Ericson and other cases. There was more to be determined, as the Supreme Court requires, Erickson v Pardus, 551 U S 89 (2007) I did not cite "Diversity" because i needed a trial to prove the defendant's domicillary. I will re-file the case The D C Superior Court does not want African-American juries so they devised a ruse to deny them. Shame on you! The court also erred by allowing Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to reconsider another judge's decision
[+] Melissa Turner on PEOPLE v. BRANHAM
Kimberly Branham is currently my wife and has been mentally abusing myself and my children for the last 4 years. She has contacted my ex-husband's lawyer and filled their heads with unbelievable lies to try to get my children taken away from me. She knows that they are the most important people in my life and I would do anything for my children. She is using them as a target with myself as the real target of her jealousy as I have left her once before and she has done the same thing. We are going to court 7/7/2017 at 9:00 am. I am going to try to get an extension on the Order of Protection to be permanent as I know she is mentally unstable and I fear her capabilities to further hurt me emotionally or worse yet physically. This is for the record. Thank you!
[+] K toms on UNITED STATES v. GONZALEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Human interest only. Me and my friend, as Administration of Justice Students, had the ATF under surveillance while they had the suspects under surveillance, while Redondo Beach Police had us under surveillance in Redondo Beach, CA. We discovered the case accidentally while listening to a police scanner-type receiver. We watched this on and off for about 2 months. We were stopped 1 time by Redondo Beach Police in the Taco Bell parking lot across the street from the motel where the agents were posted. The employees of the Taco Bell called because we were seen a few days in a row. We explained to the PD that we were AJ Students and they left us alone. My personal feeling is they might have known about the Feds and thought we were undercover. About 6 months later I read the whole story in the newspaper.......
[+] USAN BROWNING on BROWNING v. KLEE
sounds like browning was railroaded just because he had a criminal record. he needs a new trial.
[+] John P. Gauvin on JULIAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. OLD VILLAGE MILL, LLC
As the owner of OVM we find ourselfs are heading back to the courts to file another lawsuit against Julian Development for providing at least two fraudulent bonds supplied by Great Northern Bonding ltd and Newport Insurance Company Inc. Also part of our new claims will spell out that Julian's left the project with over $400,000 in Erosion and Sediment Control issues.
[+] J.D. on NELSON v. COLORADO
If the old exoneration bill in Colorado was found to be unconstitutional you still have a few individuals falling through the cracks a somewhat crippled Old bill? You need to allow any previous case's to be reviewed... It was installed for over three years? The Fair approach with this particular adjustment, is to put correct reasonable time limits, statue of limitations needs to be extended in the name of justice and clean hands, Appeal's Court may have found harmful errors. In a few of those cases in the last four years. And then corrections can be property made to the damaged.... Keep up the Good Work! .
[+] Sheila R Day on U.S. v. KOWALCZYK
I am just sickened by all this crap my daughter was a victim of his. Does he or his family have any clue how much pain the victims are going threw not to mention this is for the rest of there life's. may you be a parent loved one or the victim them self they will never have a normal life. this man has taken from them. I do not believe he is mentally incompetent or capable of understanding the law and prosses. if so he wouldn't of been able to drag this on for as long as he has
[+] Rev. Hugh daniels on PEOPLE v. DAVIS
The unjust Lower Court in this senario failed to recognize The Power of Researching by Study and determination to search for Legal Precedents which made them look incompetent in The Lower Court. The The plaintiff (The State) ironically in turn became the defendant and vice versa as a tesult of true law interpretation. In this case it is Ares Juda Cata in previous Precedants. It has aready been decided by previous precedants. Busted!