Comments

Displaying 22326 to 22350 of 32859 Comments
[+] Ivana Kratochvil on IN THE INTEREST OF P.K.
In other words, there is no justice for poor people in the U. S. A.
[+] DD on FRIEDMAN v. GUTHY-RENKER LLC
Does anyone know the status of the case?
[+] Leon Rosenblatt on MUHTAR v. GOLDMAN
TRUE JUSTICE
[+] ricky yocum on MEADOWS v. CHEVRON, U.S.A., INC.
My great grandmother miny meadors is the true inheritance of this case my family don't know what to do
[+] Roy Chenault on PARK HILLS CENTER, LLC v. PIMLICO PARKWAY, LLC
When will be the ground breaking date this is wonderful what down there to eat quite expensive
[+] Kent Khuen on UNITED STATES v. M/V BERND LEONHARDT
I was standing the cold iron watch in O2N2 plant #3 looking into hanger bay #3 when the collision happened. Heal to port was sever and I was knocked back against the air compressor. I went through the plant to the deck house and looked out the hatches where the life boat sponson is. There waa small fire out there that went out on its own. No collision alarm was sounded until after the collision. This might have saved a lot of injuries. I took pictures when it was light of the life boat and some of the damage. At first sound I thought a plain had hit the the Sara. Wow what a rush. I was a 3rd class MM at that time. I am now MM1(SS) Retired.
[+] John mc dally on PEOPLE v. ENSLEY
Thank you!
[+] dane elder on MILLER v. McGOVERN
the 10th circuit got it wrong in part of this, because offsetting any benefit that is purchased has to have notice given at the outset of the agreement. Here, widows are blindsided because as big as the statutory scheme is--they aren't expected to know that something is buried deep inside a law. notice has to be early enough for a widow to protect herself by seeking alternative policies. She is simply not afforded that chance.
[+] John Janvier on JANVIER v. COWLES
Voting is a Right
[+] Daniel on WOODY v. DELRAY MEDICAL CENTER
If a Dr. negligence causes the death of a patient working under a fictitious name then that Dr. is not liable?
[+] Ed Stoll on STOLL v. EMMET CIRCUIT COURT CHIEF JUDGE
How is it, that police testimony, was different, from police reports? Not just one, but all. They all claimed, Clerical error. They submitted,the reports, then change them, at trial?
[+] Ed Stoll on STOLL v. EMMET CIRCUIT COURT CHIEF JUDGE
Why was, She, Tina Marie Stoll, convicted, as a habitual offender? She didn't have a felony conviction, prior to this case.
[+] Laura Leathers on PEOPLE v. FLOYD
What a shame ! I used to babysit the children when they lived in Mt Carmel. There was violence then too.
[+] McKinney on ORR v. BROOKE CORPORATION BANKRUPTCY ESTATE
Glad the court ruled against Mr. Orr. He wrecked many lives with his greed.
[+] Christopher Trotta on HARTLEY v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
May I ask when the claim forms were mailed to former Wells Fargo employees for this matter. What date were they supposed to be mailed and what was the deadline for them to be mailed back? Thanks,
[+] Paige Dean on IN THE MATTER OF DEPENDENCY OF P.T.
Please let me know how I can help P.T. I have been following this case for many years and am relieved that Washington has lost custody.
[+] Christian Mosco on MOSCO v. STATE
Wow,that was so long ago........to know then what I know Now
[+] Banoth mangya on HAGEDORN v. OBAMA
Sir plz tell me case status of wp no:16919
[+] Ann Rhodes Haller on COM. ex rel. HALLER v. HANNA
This is a haunting account of lying and deceit. The above so called "mother" was cold and calculating; a vindictive manipulator, fooling the kindness of Captain Haller. "Judy" was ripped out of the only happy and stable home she had ever known at age 8, and given to a "mother" she hardly knew and a step-father she didn't know. She was forced to change her name immediately and strongly advised by this "mother" not to tell anyone. She was reunited with her grandparents at age 22. This is an example of a legal kidnapping. I am the object of this custody suit, formerly known as Judith Ann Jinkner.
[+] Patsy tyler on GREEN v. AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY
I felt that they was holding back on things that they was surposed have taken care of . I still had 2pay money
[+] Harold Kistner on ESTATE OF FREEBAIRN
This decision disgusts me. Why didn't these judges take the opportunity to follow the reasoning of their colleague by which they might have arrived at a decision that would have had the beauty of justice to add to the mind numbing convoluted nonsense that justifies the absurd.
[+] Christine Noble on GULINO v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
The case is still going on and it is in the damages stage
[+] sunil on PEOPLE v. PRAHALAD
I got rail road please for a review
[+] Lisa on LUGO v. CALIFORNIA
He is innocint
[+] davi hernandez on PETRONE v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC.
I'm interested to now what going on please let me know by my mail I'm student from 03/2010 thanks