Comments
Displaying 501 to 525 of 32859 Comments
[+] Samuel Blount on VARGAS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Hello, I was wondering if I am still valid under this lawsuit to pursue legal action in regards to my car problems regarding my 2014 Ford focus. Not sure if this is right email link to inquire about this or not. Please help or guide me if you may. Thank you
Hello, I was wondering if I am still valid under this lawsuit to pursue legal action in regards to my car problems regarding my 2014 Ford focus. Not sure if this is right email link to inquire about this or not. Please help or guide me if you may. Thank you
[+] Doc English on REID v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Such a frivolous claim! I am a black guy and found nothing offensive or insensitive about the package. It was much better than what it was replaced with as far as the contents were concerned. Inmates have an invariable ability to ruin things for everyone by their hypersensitive dislike for the situation they created for themselves.
Such a frivolous claim! I am a black guy and found nothing offensive or insensitive about the package. It was much better than what it was replaced with as far as the contents were concerned. Inmates have an invariable ability to ruin things for everyone by their hypersensitive dislike for the situation they created for themselves.
[+] Raul castillo on DURHAM v. SACHS ELECTRIC COMPANY
Could someone please contact me in regards to when checks will be sent out for this class action suits I was an involved party. I did receive a letter but have since misplaced it and I’m not sure if checks have been sent out. My mail has recently had to be held at the post office for pick up and I just wanna make sure I did not miss it and if so what I need to do. Thanks Raul Castillo.
Could someone please contact me in regards to when checks will be sent out for this class action suits I was an involved party. I did receive a letter but have since misplaced it and I’m not sure if checks have been sent out. My mail has recently had to be held at the post office for pick up and I just wanna make sure I did not miss it and if so what I need to do. Thanks Raul Castillo.
[+] Allen Nowell on NOWELL v. REIDMUELLER
I am joe Bernard’s son I want to know what my father has done.
I am joe Bernard’s son I want to know what my father has done.
[+] Raul Castillo on DURHAM v. SACHS ELECTRIC COMPANY
Could someone contact me about when checks are being sent out in the class action lawsuit against sachs Electric. I have misplaced my last letter from the lawyers about this case
Could someone contact me about when checks are being sent out in the class action lawsuit against sachs Electric. I have misplaced my last letter from the lawyers about this case
[+] Carol Nash on MATTER OF HICKS v. NEW YORK STATE DEP'T OF HEALTH
Definitely neglect. Thanks for the info.
Definitely neglect. Thanks for the info.
[+] Richard Hone on U.S. v. ALEXIO
I used to manage Alexio when he was Heavyweight Champ. He was a nut case then and he's obviously an even worse, narcissistic nut case now
I used to manage Alexio when he was Heavyweight Champ. He was a nut case then and he's obviously an even worse, narcissistic nut case now
[+] Elsie Compo on GAMBLES v. STERLING INFOSYSTEMS, INC.
Amother screwing by the corrupt legal system of America. Yes I am this Elsie Compo
Amother screwing by the corrupt legal system of America. Yes I am this Elsie Compo
[+] Robert Enox on STATE v. LORMAND
Jason Lormond should have been executed and the State Of Louisiana would not have to listen to his excuses for parole.
Jason Lormond should have been executed and the State Of Louisiana would not have to listen to his excuses for parole.
[+] Dariel thompson on U.S. v. THOMPSON
This is Dariel Thompson and if possible please this need to be seal bc I have kids and grandkids this is dangerous to our lives.
This is Dariel Thompson and if possible please this need to be seal bc I have kids and grandkids this is dangerous to our lives.
[+] Larry Rodriguez Vazquez on FONTAN ASSOCIATES, INC. v. MEDPARK, INC.
Saludos, necesito comunicarme con el Sr. Samuel H. Jove Fontan, sonbre Bonanza Rexville Bayamon, 787 -397-1075
Saludos, necesito comunicarme con el Sr. Samuel H. Jove Fontan, sonbre Bonanza Rexville Bayamon, 787 -397-1075
[+] Shareemccorkle on EVANS v. HACKWORTH
That my son I need to no what's going on when people take his money and lie about where he live at .
That my son I need to no what's going on when people take his money and lie about where he live at .
[+] Michael J Dee on IN RE VILLARREAL
Cpurt Rule 20. 4. (b)It was denied because the court refused to order a response and to seek relief in another court. Villarreal has already been to the district court in which he was convicted with a 2255 Motion to Vacate. SCOTUS rules 20. 4. (b) are inconsistent with federal law 28 USC 2241-43
Cpurt Rule 20. 4. (b)It was denied because the court refused to order a response and to seek relief in another court. Villarreal has already been to the district court in which he was convicted with a 2255 Motion to Vacate. SCOTUS rules 20. 4. (b) are inconsistent with federal law 28 USC 2241-43
[+] Cindy Longo on SANCHEZ v. SANTANDER BANK, N.A.
I received a check yesterday from the Crystal Sanchez case against Santander Bank Civil Action No. 17-5775 (PGS)(DEA). I would like to verify that is a settlement from the above mentioned law suit and is a valid check. I await your response Thank you
I received a check yesterday from the Crystal Sanchez case against Santander Bank Civil Action No. 17-5775 (PGS)(DEA). I would like to verify that is a settlement from the above mentioned law suit and is a valid check. I await your response Thank you
[+] Roxanne Joganik on JOGANIK v. EAST TEXAS MEDICAL CENTER
The Judge is not fair and a JMOL should have been granted
The Judge is not fair and a JMOL should have been granted
[+] Susan Suong Nguyen on NGUYEN v. PENNSYLVANIA
NGUYEN v. PENNSYLVANIA Re: Civil Action No. 19-CV-2551. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 3, 2022 COMMENT on the MEMORANDUM JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge. Your Honor, with all due respect, below are the facts of the complaint: I. FACTS Plaintiff Susan Nguyen, who is representing herself (proceeding pro se), filed a Complaint against: The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, for the financial, legal and mental abuses suffered from an unclarified employment termination for personal reasons permissible by the Employment At-Will Policy in the State of PA. The Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission ("PHRC") where there was crime involved in her case filed withdrawal but she was a part of the criminal proceeding in the middle of the process even though she is not a criminal. She does not own firearms And the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, issued and enforced three Court Orders after the case was dismissed and thrown out of the Philadelphia Court Of Common Pleas
NGUYEN v. PENNSYLVANIA Re: Civil Action No. 19-CV-2551. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 3, 2022 COMMENT on the MEMORANDUM JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge. Your Honor, with all due respect, below are the facts of the complaint: I. FACTS Plaintiff Susan Nguyen, who is representing herself (proceeding pro se), filed a Complaint against: The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, for the financial, legal and mental abuses suffered from an unclarified employment termination for personal reasons permissible by the Employment At-Will Policy in the State of PA. The Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission ("PHRC") where there was crime involved in her case filed withdrawal but she was a part of the criminal proceeding in the middle of the process even though she is not a criminal. She does not own firearms And the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, issued and enforced three Court Orders after the case was dismissed and thrown out of the Philadelphia Court Of Common Pleas
[+] Aiden Hicks on U.S. v. RENE E.
I believe they were strongly infringing on his second amendment rights. Well that is if he had any 2A rights. Now you see he lost those rights when he A. Had drug paraphernalia And B. He ran from the officers. So because of that he lost his 2A rights.
I believe they were strongly infringing on his second amendment rights. Well that is if he had any 2A rights. Now you see he lost those rights when he A. Had drug paraphernalia And B. He ran from the officers. So because of that he lost his 2A rights.
