VARGAS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Case No. CV12-08388 AB (FFMx).

OMAR VARGAS, ROBERT BERTONE, MICHELLE HARRIS, and SHARON HEBERLING individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division.

March 5, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Omar Vargas, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, represented by Steven R. Weinmann , Capstone Law APC, Cody R. Padgett , Capstone Law APC, Eric Lechtzin , Berger Montague PC, Jordan L. Lurie , Pomerantz LLP, Lane L. Vines , BERGER MONTAGUE PC, pro hac vice, Mark A. Ozzello , Capstone Law APC, Robert K. Friedl , Capstone Law APC, Russell D. Paul , Berger and Montague PC, pro hac vice, Ryan H. Wu , Capstone Law APC, Tarek H. Zohdy , Capstone Law APC & Thomas A. Zimmerman, Jr. , Zimmerman Law Offices PC, pro hac vice.

Robert Bertone, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Michelle Harris, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals & Sharon Heberling, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, represented by Steven R. Weinmann , Capstone Law APC, Cody R. Padgett , Capstone Law APC, Eric Lechtzin , Berger Montague PC, Jordan L. Lurie , Pomerantz LLP, Lane L. Vines , BERGER MONTAGUE PC, pro hac vice, Mark A. Ozzello , Capstone Law APC, Robert K. Friedl , Capstone Law APC, Russell D. Paul , Berger and Montague PC, pro hac vice, Ryan H. Wu , Capstone Law APC & Tarek H. Zohdy , Capstone Law APC.

Kevin Klipfel, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals & Andrea Klipfel, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Consol Plaintiffs, represented by Cody R. Padgett , Capstone Law APC, Jordan L. Lurie , Pomerantz LLP, Lane L. Vines , BERGER MONTAGUE PC, pro hac vice, Robert K. Friedl , Capstone Law APC, Russell D. Paul , Berger and Montague PC, pro hac vice & Tarek H. Zohdy , Capstone Law APC.

Eric Dufour, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Patricia Soltesiz, Jason Porterfield, Lindsay Schmidt, Tonya Patze, Joshua Bruno, Abigail Fisher, Jamie Porterfield, Christi Groshong, Patricia Schwennker, Maureen Cusick & Virginia Otte, Consol Plaintiffs, represented by Cody R. Padgett , Capstone Law APC, Eric Lechtzin , Berger Montague PC, Jordan L. Lurie , Pomerantz LLP, Lane L. Vines , BERGER MONTAGUE PC, pro hac vice, Robert K. Friedl , Capstone Law APC, Russell D. Paul , Berger and Montague PC, pro hac vice & Tarek H. Zohdy , Capstone Law APC.

Shaunt Shawn Arslanian, Petitioner, represented by Daniel S. Imber , Imber Law Group, A Professional Corporation.

Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by John Mark Thomas , Dykema Gossett PLLC, David M. George , Dykema Gossett PLLC, pro hac vice, Fred J. Fresard , Dykema PLLC, pro hac vice, Krista L. Lenart , Dykema Gossett LLP, pro hac vice & Tamara A. Bush , Dykema Gossett LLP.

Eduardo Gonzalez, Interested Party, represented by Rowena G. Santos , Greenberg Traurig LLP.

Oliver Sit, Interested Party, represented by Elliot J. Conn , Kemnitzer Barron and Krieg LLP.

Jennifer E Lange, Interested Party, represented by John W. Hanson , The Hanson Law Firm.

Brenda Lott, Suzanne Lutz, Carlie Olivant, Gail Slomine & Philip Woloszyn, Objectors, represented by Nancy E. Gray , Gray and Associates PC, David J. Gorberg , David J Gorberg and Associates, pro hac vice & Michael T. Kirkpatrick , Public Citizen Litigation Group, pro hac vice.

Jason DeBolt, Objector, represented by Arnab Banerjee , Banner Law Group PC, Clark Ovruchesky , CO Law APC & George W. Cochran , Law Offices of George Cochran, pro hac vice.

Jordan Cyr, Opt-Outs, Objector, represented by John Neil Gieleghem , Consumer Legal Remedies APC, Dani K. Liblang , The Liblang Law Firm PC, pro hac vice & Kenneth A. Stern , Stern Law PLLC, pro hac vice.

Robert Earl Case, Jr, Objector, pro se.


FINAL JUDGMENT

Under Rules 54(b) and 58, it is adjudged as follows:

1. The Court entered a Final Approval Order approving the Settlement;

2. For the reasons stated in the Court's Final Approval Order, judgment is hereby entered in accordance with the Final Approval Order; and

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases