Comments

Displaying 8926 to 8950 of 32859 Comments
[+] Celeste on BULETTE v. WESTERN DENTAL SERVICES INC.
My son has received a check but my daughter was also a patient at the same time and discussed treatments. Will she be receiving a check as well?
[+] Paul Besmertnik on PEOPLE v. LAGANA
Did he go to jail?
[+] Jody Craun on FINCHER v. MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
This is sickening. Today's amerikka, I hope the judge rots in hell
[+] Connor Alevok on PEOPLE v. COMBS
His bullet didn’t kill the guy #freejmoney
[+] James Nicosia on BUTLER v. DEMARCO
I am on that class action suit. Was never treated or j ad to live so bad. Want compensation
[+] MARK EASTMAN on CHURCH OF GOSPEL MINISTRY, INC. v. UNITED STATES
I lost my Ordained Minister Certificates and credentials in a fire that took my home , can you help me get replacements please ?
[+] Doctor C Ackerman MD licensed Medical doctor Doctor Ackerman on ACKERMAN v. FREITAG
Dr Freitag hit Dr Cheryl Ackerman MD Dr Freitag has agreed that Dr Freitag owes Dr Cheryl Ackerman $155.555. in arears. he hit wife. did not pay child support. violation of PSA. Freitag did not object to paying Dr Cheryl Ackerman MD
[+] Doctor C Ackerman MD Ackerman Licensed on ACKERMAN v. FREITAG
Dr Freitag lied to judge Kessler. as my son was in College. which is pergury. punishable
[+] Frank on ORLAN v. SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC.
I purchased shares of SPNG, so how could I do that without the stock going through proper protocol before being listed ? Since they were listed all those involved to list the stock should be held liable. Is there any more litigation pending? Are all corporate officers and lawyers still around to be sued for fraud?
[+] The Quiet One on PEOPLE v. MONARQUE
Did anyone state the Fact that Appellant went to the Victims House Right after he was Killed and told his Girlfriend that he was Shot and Killed ??? Who Does that ? No One ... He was Innocent for the Murder And a Stand up Kid to Ride that Beef and Not Tell who Actually did the Crime .
[+] Jeffrey T Maehr on MAEHR v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner was denied due process on the actual Supreme Court case precedent, denied pre-assessment documents allegedly used to create the assessment... and the IRS and courts ignored the lack of proof of debt, and the actual Supreme Court's own rulings on the subject of what is "income" and the 16th Amendment fraud being perpetrated against 150 million Americans.
[+] Kristina (Tina) on IN RE THUR
I last commented on November 7, 2018. This little girl is forever on my mind. I wish there was a way to view her grave so we could leave "virtual flowers". I have Tina Marie in her crib in her grandmother's house, Evelyn Malik, forever burned in my mind. I will never forge that sweetie. I know that she is in Heaven waiting for all of us.
[+] R. Coit on TIMBERLAKE v. METROPOLITAN LLOYDS INS. CO.
Met life only paid for the temporary repairs. Nothing else.
[+] WM Anthony Brantley on PRINCE HALL LODGE v. PRIDE OF HARRISBURG LODGE
Thank you so much for clarity,as a young brother in the order of 5 years, I've been looking and doing a little research and this is very uplifting asci read the proceedings. SMIB
[+] German Shepard on SANTOS v. JOHNSON AND WALES UNIVERSITY
Complaint Nos. 01-20-2199 (Johnson and Wales University) and 01-20- 4042 (Warwick Police Department), OCR acknowledged that you had named additional entities in your complaint materials and that OCR would docket and evaluate those matters separately. You alleged that campus police at Framingham State University assaulted you in 2018 (Allegation 1). You also allege that the University discriminated and retaliated against you when the University filed a lawsuit against you in 2018, and as a part of this ongoing lawsuit you were served a court summons in January 2020 (Allegation 4). Finally, you allege that in November 2019, an officer from the Warwick Police Department assaulted you and called you a “faggot” (Allegation 5). Please be advised that the University must not harass, coerce, intimidate, discriminate, or otherwise retaliate against an individual because that individual asserts a right or privilege under a law enforced by OCR NYPD Internal Affairs Report 2019-40930
[+] William Gilroy on GILROY EX REL. MASON v. KONA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AUTHORITIES
When one administrates claims for damages against public servants engaging in criminal activity, surely the criminals all scratch each others backs.
[+] Jessica Interiano on PEOPLE v. NOVY
I am James and Johnny's half sister and am trying to locate Johnny. Anyone with information on him or the Novy family, no matter how old, please email me: [email protected]
[+] She Prince Bassett on J. C. TRAHAN, DRILLING CONTRACTOR, INC. v. HAGY
Is J C Trehan still alive?
[+] Sherry on WILLIAMS v. STATE
I got on here to see if she’d been released yet. I saw in a comment she had and I’m glad for her! How about locking up real criminals instead of abused woman she’d just reach her breaking point in my eyes! Good luck Regina hope you and your kids are well!!
[+] John on STATE v. WILLIAMS
Ronnie C.Williams was my people.
[+] Richard Beckham on FURLOUGH v. CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLC
I have received a check from a class action against my former employer. I want to know if I should cash it or not? I need to find out if getting charged an Equipment Fee is legal. At times, and that's almost everytime, I had more money deducted for equipment fee than i would take home. Im asking whomever, how or if I am owed my money back? And how was it possible that some workers take home pay was less than $500? But in the same warehouse, other employees were taking home over $1000? There is favoritism in deciding which trucks you will be unloading and which trucks someone else gets. I need some advise. Thanks for your time.
[+] Lawana on CURETON v. PHILBRICK
Iam the mother of said child waited for 37 years to see him i am still waiting
[+] Sir'Ron DeWitt on ZALDIVAR v. BARNHART
Yokimo is my first cousin and I would like to know how I can help
[+] Chris on STOVIC v. U.S., RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
In case 14-1251 THe Appeals Court state, "Stovic provided little to no explanation of how his initial decision contained a “clerical error or an error that appears on the face of the evidence.” Id. § 261.2(c)(7). The court turn blind eye and ignore the document for "the error in the "INITIAL benefits" that did not comply with the law, the categories for and individual