1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BOND v. BOND
 

BOND v. BOND

Nos. A-2511-09T3, A-3723-09T3

JONATHAN BOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WENDY BOND, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 22, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia M. Barbarito argued the cause for appellant (Einhorn, Harris, Ascher, Barbarito & Frost, P.C., attorneys; Bonnie C. Frost and Christopher J. Roman , on the brief).

Paul A. Rowe argued the cause for respondent (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis, L.L.P., attorneys; Mr. Rowe and Lisa B. DiPasqua , on the brief).

Before Judges Carchman, Fisher & Baxter.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

This appeal addresses the issue of whether creation of a special needs trust can justify the elimination of the obligation to pay child support to the primary residential parent of a special needs child. We conclude that while a party may utilize a special needs trust to take advantage of government programs to lessen the burden on the parent to provide support and medical assistance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases