1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ROERS v. PIERCE
 

ROERS v. PIERCE

No. A11-237.

Alan J. Roers, et al., Appellants, v. Michael B. Pierce, et al., Defendants, Gilmore, L.L.C., et al., Respondents, Lindquist & Vennum, P.L.L.P., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed November 14, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kay Nord Hunt , Lee A. Hutton, III , Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for appellants.

Karen K. Kurth , Thomas P. Malone , Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd., Coon Rapids, Minnesota, for respondents Gilmore, et al.

Considered and decided by Johnson, Chief Judge; Stoneburner, Judge; and Harten, Judge.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellants challenge the district court's order on priority of distribution of settlement proceeds in this action, arguing that the district court erred in holding that the garnishment action of one appellant's judgment creditor has priority over appellant law firm's attorney lien and applies to non-marital assets of the judgment debtor's spouse. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

In April 2007, appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases