1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 392 S.C.
  5. 392 S.C. 340 (2011)
 

AHRENS v. STATE

No. 26966.

392 S.C. 340 (2011)

709 S.E.2d 54

Nancy S. AHRENS, Ann Mercer, and Gary M. McCombs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Respondents/Appellants, v. The STATE of South Carolina and the South Carolina Retirement System, Appellants/Respondents. and James B. Arnold, Jr., Cynthia A. Thompkins-Hart, Nelson E. Brown, William M. Tisdale, Jr., Bobby Pack, Mitch Anderson, Lorenza Cobb, Ivan Holden, Phillip White, Jamie Harrelson, Dan Furr, Ann U. Mercer, Sharon C. Fulton, Johnnie R. Deas, Katie Daniels and Barbara Durfey, Panda J. Duncan, Janet Klee, John Locklair, Carol Ann Williamson and Leon Bellamy, Individually and as Class Representatives, Respondents/Appellants, v. The South Carolina Police Officers Retirement System, The South Carolina Retirement System, and the State of South Carolina, Appellants/Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided May 2, 2011.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Stepp , Roland M. Franklin, Jr. , Amy L.B. Hill , and Tina Cundari , all of Sowell, Gray, Stepp & Laffitte, of Columbia, David K. Avant and Justin R. Werner , both of Columbia; for Appellants-Respondents.

A. Camden Lewis , Keith M. Babcock and Ariail E. King , all of Lewis & Babcock, of Columbia; Brana J. Williams , of Conway; Gene McCain Connell, Jr. , of Kelaher, Connell & Connor, of Surfside Beach and Richard A. Harpootlian , of Columbia, for Respondents-Appellants.

Chief Justice TOAL:

In 2006, this Court decided Layman v. State, 368 S.C. 631, 630 S.E.2d 265 (2006), remanding to the circuit court the issue of whether a contract existed between the South Carolina Retirement System (SCRS) and certain retirees.1 This case is an appeal from the circuit court's decision on remand. In this case, the South Carolina Police Officers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases