1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ESTATE OF JAVIER ORTIZ FUENTES
 

CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ESTATE OF JAVIER ORTIZ FUENTES

No. 10-15775.

CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF JAVIER ORTIZ FUENTES, by and through its Representative, Defendant, ELIZABETH S. ORTIZ; ALEXIS J. ORTIZ; KASSANDRA N. ORTIZ, Defendants-counter-claimants, and VERONICA DIEGO, Guardian ad Litem for minors, Jose Antonio Diego and Roberto Diego-Jeronimo; MARIA GUADALUPE VEGA, Guardian Ad Litem for minors, Karina Alejandra Cortes Alfaro and Luis Gerargo Cortes Alfaro; MARIA MERCADO, Guardian ad Litem of Vicky Nava, Joselyn Nava and Stephanie Nava; FAVIOLA QUEZADAS DE VELASQUEZ, Guardian ad Litem for minor, Laura Alejandra Valasquez Quezadas, Alondra Lizabeth Velasquez Quezadas, Jose De Jesus Velasquez-Quezada, John Velasquez-Quezada, Richard Velasquez-Quezada, and Diego Emmanuel Velasquez-Quezada, Defendants-counter-claimants-Appellants. CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF JAVIER ORTIZ FUENTES, by and through its Representative, Defendant-Appellant, ELIZABETH S. ORTIZ; ALEXIS J. ORTIZ; KASSANDRA N. ORTIZ, Defendants-counter-claimants-Appellants, and VERONICA DIEGO, Guardian ad Litem for minors, Jose Antonio Diego and Roberto Diego-Jeronimo; MARIA GUADALUPE VEGA, Guardian Ad Litem for minors, Karina Alejandra Cortes Alfaro and Luis Gerargo Cortes Alfaro; MARIA MERCADO, Guardian ad Litem of Vicky Nava, Joselyn Nava and Stephanie Nava; FAVIOLA QUEZADAS DE VELASQUEZ, Guardian ad Litem for minor, Laura Alejandra Valasquez Quezadas, Alondra Lizabeth Velasquez Quezadas, Jose De Jesus Velasquez-Quezada, John Velasquez-Quezada, Richard Velasquez-Quezada, and Diego Emmanuel Velasquez-Quezada, Defendants-counter-claimants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed May 19, 2011.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM*

Appellants appeal the district court's decision granting Carolina Casualty Insurance Company's ("Carolina Casualty") motion for summary judgment, and denying Appellants' motion for summary judgment. Appellants argue that the district court erred in concluding that A&A Transport Company ("A&A") was not covered as an additional insured by Antonini's insurance policy with Carolina Casualty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases