1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 36 F.3d
  5. 36 F.3d 65 (1994)
 

FULLER v. VINES

No. 93-15098.

36 F.3d 65 (1994)

James FULLER, Sr.; James Fuller, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Officer VINES, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 16, 1994.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rejection of Suggestion for Rehearing November 23, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Kirk Boyd and Ruth M. Berkowitz, Boyd, Huffman & Williams, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

A. Byrne Conley and Terry Senne, Gibbons, Lees & Edrington, Walnut Creek, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Before: HUG, SCHROEDER, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rejection of Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc November 23, 1994.

HUG, Circuit Judge:

James Fuller, Sr., James Fuller, Jr., and others in the Fuller family ("the Fullers") sued police officers of the City of Richmond and the City of Richmond under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for the killing of their pet dog, and James Fuller, Jr. ("James Jr.") sued for interference with his liberty rights when a police officer pointed a loaded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases