1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MEDTRONIC, INC. v. HUGHES
 

MEDTRONIC, INC. v. HUGHES

No. A10-998.

Medtronic, Inc., et al., plaintiffs/counter defendants, Respondents, v. James Michael Hughes, defendant/counter plaintiff, Appellant, St. Jude Medical S. C., Inc., intervenor counter plaintiff, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed January 18, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Z. Pentelovitch , Wayne S. Moskowitz , Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

Edward F. Fox , Charles E. Lundberg , Bassford Remele, PA, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and James A. Gale , pro hac vice, Feldman Gale, PA, Miami, Florida, for appellants.

Considered and decided by Klaphake, Presiding Judge; Halbrooks, Judge; and Connolly, Judge.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellants James M. Hughes and St. Jude Medical, S. C., Inc., challenge the district court's judgment in favor of respondents Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic USA, Inc. (collectively Medtronic). Specifically, appellants argue that the district court erred in concluding that Medtronic's noncompete covenant with Hughes is enforceable and that Medtronic is entitled to damages on its claim against St. Jude for tortious interference...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases