UNPUBLISHED OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02(f), appellant challenges the district court's denial of his motion to vacate its civil-commitment order on the grounds that his commitment violates his constitutional rights and that his attorney was ineffective. Because a rule 60.02 motion is not the proper mechanism for asserting a constitutional challenge to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP) and because appellant's claims...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.