EMPIRE MACHINERY v. LITTON BUSINESS TEL. SYSTEMS

No. 1 CA-CIV 3188.

115 Ariz. 568 (1977)

566 P.2d 1044

EMPIRE MACHINERY CO., an Arizona Corporation, Appellant, v. LITTON BUSINESS TELEPHONE SYSTEMS, DIVISION OF LITTON SYSTEMS, INC., Litton Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Litcom, a division of Litton Industries, Inc., Litton Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

Review Denied September 20, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ryley, Carlock & Ralston by George Read Carlock, James E. Brophy, III, N. Warner Lee, Phoenix, for appellant.

Lewis & Roca by Roger W. Kaufman, Paul G. Ulrich, Kimball J. Corson, Phoenix, for appellees.


JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

This is a contract action in which we are called upon to determine whether execution of a "home office acceptance" clause is the exclusive means by which a contract can be made binding.

This action was instituted by Empire Machinery Co. (Empire) against Litton Systems Co. and various divisions and subsidiary companies of Litton Systems Co. (collectively referred to as Litton) seeking damages for breach of a contract to install an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases