UNITED STATES of America et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
RESERVE MINING COMPANY et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fifth Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 20, 1974.
Supplemental Opinion May 11, 1974.
Additional Supplemental Opinion August 3, 1974.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Robert G. Renner, U. S. Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., John P. Hills, Pollution Control Section, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Thomas Bastow, Legal Support Div., Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff United States.
Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen. of Minn., St. Paul, Minn., Jonathan H. Morgan, Sol. Gen. of Minn., St. Paul, Minn., Byron E. Starns, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen. of Minn., St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff State of Minnesota.
John E. Kofron, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Wis., Madison, Wis. for intervenor State of Wisconsin.
Jerome Maslowski, Francis J. Carrier and Clive D. Gemmill, Lansing, Mich. for intervenor State of Michigan.
Howard J. Vogel, Minneapolis, Minn., Scott H. Lang, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff intervenors.
William P. Dinan, City Atty., Duluth, Minn., for plaintiff intervenor, City of Duluth.
William A. Hammann, City Atty., Superior, Wis., for plaintiff intervenor, City of Superior.
Edward T. Fride, Sullivan, Hanft, Hastings, Fride & O'Brien, Duluth, Minn., Maclay, Hyde, Lindquist and Vennum, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant Reserve Mining Co.
William T. Egan, Rider, Bennett, Egan, Johnson & Arundel, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant Republic Steel Corp.
Charles Murnane and Robert T. White, Murnane, Murnane, Battis & Conlin, St. Paul, Minn., for defendant Armco Steel Corp.
Wayne G. Johnson, Johnson & Thomas, Silver Bay, Minn., William R. Ojala, Fred A. Cina, Aurora, Minn., Mitchel H. Costley, Lake County Atty., Two Harbors, Minn., John M. Donovan, Joseph B. Johnson, Duluth, Minn., John G. Engberg, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant intervenor.
United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fifth Division.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILES W. LORD, District Judge.
This action for injunctive relief is before the Court after 139 days of trial, which included testimony from well over 100 witnesses, over 1621 exhibits, and over 18,000 pages of transcript. Of necessity, it will require several weeks before the Court will be able to set forth in writing its detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Inasmuch as the case deals with issues concerning public health...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
