In this appeal, plaintiff contends that the Court should eliminate the substantial factor test in increased-risk medical malpractice cases. See Scafidi v. Seiler,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
REYNOLDS v. GONZALEZ
798 A.2d 67 (2002)
172 N.J. 266
Frank REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mario D. GONZALEZ, M.D., a licensed physician of the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Respondent, and Meadowlands Hospital Medical Center, a Hospital Corporation of the State of New Jersey, its servants, agents or employees, John Doe and Mary Roe # 1-5 (fictitious names intending to designate nurses and health care professionals who participated in the care, management, post surgical management and care of Plaintiff), and each of them jointly, severally or in the alternative, Defendants.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued February 25, 2002.
Decided June 11, 2002.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Judith A. Wahrenberger, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent (Wahrenberger & O'Brien, attorneys).
E. Drew Britcher, Morristown, argued the cause for amicus curiae, Association of Trial Lawyers New Jersey (Britcher, Leone & Roth, attorneys).
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.