1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.Ct.
  4. 129 S.Ct.
  5. 129 S.Ct. 1109 (2009)
 

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE v. LINKLINE COMM.

No. 07-512.

129 S.Ct. 1109 (2009)

555 U.S. 438

172 L.Ed.2d 836

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO., dba AT & T CALIFORNIA, et al. v. LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 25, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ed Kolto , Gleam O. Davis , Los Angeles, CA, Patrick J. Pascarella , San Antonio, Texas, Michael K. Kellogg , Aaron M. Panner , Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Petitioners.

Maxwell M. Blecher , Gary M. Joye , Blecher & Collins, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents.

The plaintiffs in this case, respondents here, allege that a competitor subjected them to a "price squeeze" in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Act. They assert that such a claim can arise when a vertically integrated firm sells inputs at wholesale and also sells finished goods or services...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases