1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 326 P.3d
  5. 326 P.3d 1139 (2014)
 

ROUSE v. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY

No. 112058.

326 P.3d 1139 (2014)

2014 OK 39

Chester ROUSE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY and Daniel S. Sullivan, Defendants/Appellees.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

As Corrected May 20, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Thomas , William D. Thomas , Thomas Law Firm PLC, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

J. Heath Lofton , Grand River Dam Authority, Vinita, Oklahoma, for Defendants/Appellees.

REIF, V.C.J.

¶ 1 On February 25, 2013, Chester Rouse filed a wrongful termination suit against the Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA) and Daniel S. Sullivan. The petition alleged GRDA and Mr. Sullivan terminated Mr. Rouse on February 17, 2012, in retaliation for filing an overtime complaint under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 through § 219. Retaliation for filing such a complaint is forbidden by section 215(a)(3) and is actionable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases