1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 81 A.D.3d
  5. 81 A.D.3d 432 (2011)
 

BAJRAKTARI MANAGEMENT CORP. v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

4179, 302737/09.

81 A.D.3d 432 (2011)

916 N.Y.S.2d 771

BAJRAKTARI MANAGEMENT CORP. et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants, and AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALITY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided February 3, 2011.

The insurance policy clearly and unambiguously defines "Continuity Date" as December 29, 2004. The motion court correctly declined to consider parol evidence to ascertain the parties' intention as to that date (see W.W.W. Assoc. v Giancontieri, 77 N.Y.2d 157, 162 [1990]). "[A] contract is not rendered ambiguous just because one of the parties attaches a different, subjective meaning to one of its terms" (Moore v Kopel,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases