COOGAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK

2775, 117786/06

73 A.D.3d 613 (2010)

900 N.Y.S.2d 645

EILEEN COOGAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and NICHOLAS EDWARD KRASNO, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 25, 2010.


Dismissal of the complaint was justified in light of the exemption afforded to "one-, two- or three-family residential real property that is (i) in whole or in part, owner occupied, and (ii) used exclusively for residential purposes" (Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-210 [b]). In support of his motion, Krasno submitted a personal affidavit that he had neither used the premises for a "home office" nor claimed any part thereof...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases