1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 985 A.2d
  5. 985 A.2d 1225 (2010)
 

ROA v. ROA

A-72 September Term 2008

985 A.2d 1225 (2010)

200 N.J. 555

Fernando ROA and Liliana Roa, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Lafe and Marino ROA, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 14, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dena E. Epstein, Morristown, argued the cause for appellants (Jackson Lewis, attorneys; Ms. Epstein and Robert M. Pettigrew, on the brief).

Louis A. Zayas, Newark, argued the cause for respondents (Ginarte O'Dwyer Gonzalez Gallardo & Winograd, attorneys).

Justice LONG delivered the opinion of the Court.

At issue on this appeal are several questions centering on the operation of the two-year statute of limitations applicable to the antiretaliation provision of New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(d). In particular, we are asked to declare whether the statute of limitations bars a retaliation claim based both on an employee's discharge and on a post-discharge retaliatory act, where the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases