LEE v. LEE

No. A07-110.

775 N.W.2d 631 (2009)

In re the Matter of Elaine Irene LEE, Appellant, v. Raymond Michael LEE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 3, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Weiner, Robert L. Weiner & Associates, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Timothy W.J. Dunn, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.

Michael Ormond, Joan H. Lucas, Minneapolis, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.


OPINION

MAGNUSON, Chief Justice.

This case concerns the interpretation of Minnesota's spousal maintenance statutes and the application of these statutes to retirement payments received from pension funds. After respondent Raymond Michael Lee retired, he brought a motion in the district court to modify his monthly maintenance obligation. The court lowered Raymond's maintenance obligation from $825 per month to $700 per month.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases