U.S. v. ALBEMARLE CORPORATION

Civil No. 5:11-cv-00991-JMC.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, Plaintiffs, v. ALBEMARLE CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Orangeburg Division.

April 17, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 7413(b)
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 7413(b) Clean Air Act
Nature of Suit: 893 Environmental Matters
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

United States of America, Plaintiff, represented by James C. Leventis, Jr. , US Attorneys Office.

United States of America, Plaintiff, represented by Karl John Fingerhood , US Department of Justice, pro hac vice, Raymond Emery Clark , US Attorneys Office, Amy Ruth Gillespie , US Department of Justice, pro hac vice, Angela Mo , US Department of Justice, pro hac vice, Barbara Murcier Bowens , US Attorneys Office, Gabriel Michael Allen , US Department of Justice, pro hac vice, James R. MacAyeal , US Department of Justice, pro hac vice & Mark Sabath , US Department of Justice, pro hac vice.

The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Plaintiff, represented by Jacquelyn Sue Dickman , DHEC, Nancy Lee Roberts , SC Department of Health and Environmental Control, Raymond Emery Clark , US Attorneys Office, Stephen Philip Hightower , SC Department of Health and Environmental Control, James C. Leventis, Jr. , James R. MacAyeal , US Department of Justice, pro hac vice & Kelly D.H. Lowry , Kelly D H Lowry PC.

Albermarle Corporation, Defendant, represented by A. Marvin Quattlebaum, Jr. , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough, James C. Leventis, Jr. , US Attorneys Office, Lane Davis , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough, Charles R. Nestrud , Chisenhall Nestrud and Julian, pro hac vice & Jason W. Early , Chisenhall Nestrud and Julian, pro hac vice.


ORDER TERMINATING CONSENT DECREE

Having reviewed the Joint Stipulation and Request for Order Terminating Consent Decree submitted by the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Consent Decree entered by this Court in this action on August 14, 2014 (ECF No. 208),...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases