1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 759 F.3d
  5. 759 F.3d 793 (2014)
 

BORMES v. U.S.

No. 13-1602.

759 F.3d 793 (2014)

James X. BORMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided July 22, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John G. Jacobs , Jacobs Kolton , Jeffrey Grant Brown , Jeffrey Grant Brown, P.C., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Mark B. Stern , Henry C. Whitaker , Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Thomas P. Walsh , Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before WOOD, Chief Judge, and BAUER and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

In an earlier stage of this litigation, the Supreme Court held that the Little Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), does not waive the sovereign immunity of the United States in a suit seeking to collect damages for an asserted violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681x. United States v. Bormes, ___ U.S. ___, 133 S.Ct. 12

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases