PRESIDIO COMPONENTS v. AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS

Nos. 2010-1355, 2011-1089.

702 F.3d 1351 (2012)

PRESIDIO COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 19, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brett A. Schatz , Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P., of Cincinnati, OH, argued for the plaintiff-cross appellant. With him on the brief was Gregory F. Ahrens .

Marvin S. Gittes , Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., of New York, NY, argued for the defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Timur E. Slonim .

Before RADER, Chief Judge, PLAGER and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.


RADER, Chief Judge.

After a trial, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California denied American Technical Ceramics Corporation's ("ATC") motions for judgment as a matter of law ("JMOL") and in the alternative a new trial on validity and infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,816,356 ("the '356 patent"). Presidio Components, Inc. v. Am. Technical Ceramics Corp., 723 F.Supp.2d 1284 (S.D.Cal.2010...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases