STANCLE v. CLAY

No. 09-56374.

692 F.3d 948 (2012)

Joseph STANCLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ivan D. CLAY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 28, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Ward , San Francisco, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.

Kamala D. Harris , Dane R. Gillette , Pamela C. Hamanaka , Kenneth C. Byrne , and David C. Cook (argued), California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for the respondent-appellee.

Before: D.W. NELSON, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, Joseph Stancle challenges the district court's conclusion that his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition is time-barred by the one-year statute of limitations in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"), codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). We confront two issues in determining whether the petition was time-barred. As to statutory tolling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases