In re KATZ INTERACTIVE CALL PROCESSING PATENT LITIGATION.
Ronald A. Katz, Technology Licensing LP, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
American Airlines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and
Fedex Corporate Services, Inc., Fedex Corporation, Fedex Customer Information Services, Inc., and Federal Express Corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and
DHL Express (USA), Inc., DHL Holdings (USA), Inc., and Sky Courier, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and
U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bank National Association, Defendants-Appellees, and
Time Warner Cable, Inc., Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Time Warner N.Y. Cable LLC, AOL, LLC, CompuServe Interactive Services, Inc., Netscape Communications Corp., Charter Communications Entertainment I LLC, Charter Communications Holding Company LLC, Charter Communications Operating LLC, and Charter Communications, Inc., Defendants, and
CSC Holdings, Inc. (now known as CSC Holdings, LLC), Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation, Cablevision of Brookhaven, Inc., Cablevision of Connecticut Corporation, Cablevision of Hudson County, Inc., Cablevision of Litchfield, Inc., Cablevision of Monmouth, Inc., Cablevision of New Jersey, Inc., Cablevision of Oakland LLC, and Cablevision of Rockland/Ramapo LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and
TDS Metrocom LLC, TDS Telecommunications Corporation, and United States Cellular Corporation, Defendants.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 18, 2011.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 22, 2011.
Mark A. Perry , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Josh A. Kevitt , of New York, NY and David A. Segal , of Irvine, CA; and Adam T. Bernstein , CSC Holding, LLC, of Bethpage, NY, for CSC Holding, et al.
Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
In this multi-district litigation patent case, the plaintiff Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing LP ("Katz") appeals from final judgments entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California in a group of consolidated cases. The judgments held numerous claims from Katz's patent portfolio either invalid or not infringed. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.
I
Katz owns a number of patents...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.