QUAN v. COMPUTER SCIENCES CORP.

Nos. 09-56190, 09-56248.

623 F.3d 870 (2010)

Frederico QUAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Walter Gray, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Don Tyrone Ballard, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Jeanine L. Shamaly, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION; CSC Retirement and Employee Benefits Plans Committee; Leon J. Level; Van B. Honeycutt; Irving W. Bailey, II; F. Warren McFarlan; Thomas H. Patrick; Donald G. Debuck; Howard D. Fisk; Michael E. Keane; Nathan Siekierka; Frederick F. Vollrath, Defendants-Appellees. Frederico Quan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Walter Gray, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Don Tyrone Ballard, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Jeanine L. Shamaly, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Computer Sciences Corporation; CSC Retirement and Employee Benefits Plans Committee; Leon J. Level; Frederick F. Vollrath; Donald G. Debuck; Michael E. Keane; Nathan Siekierka; Irving W. Bailey, II; F. Warren McFarlan; Thomas H. Patrick, Defendants-Appellants, and Van B. Honeycutt; Howard D. Fisk, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed September 30, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrice L. Bishop , Stull, Stull & Brody, Los Angeles, CA; Edwin J. Mills , Michael J. Klein , Stull, Stull & Brody, New York, NY, for plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees.

Charles C. Jackson , Thomas F. Hurka , Christopher J. Boran , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, L.L.P., Chicago, IL; Dean J. Kitchens , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, L.L.P., Los Angeles, CA; Perrie M. Weiner , Edward D. Totino , Joshua Briones , DLA Piper, L.L.P., Los Angeles, CA; Paul Blankenstein , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees-cross-appellants.

Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge, and MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge.


OPINION

BENNETT, District Judge:

This is a class action pursuant to ERISA by participants in an employer's 401(k) plan against named and de facto fiduciaries of the plan. The participants appeal the district court's order granting the fiduciaries' summary judgment motion on the participants' claims that the fiduciaries 1) imprudently invested plan assets in the employer's stock; 2) negligently misrepresented and failed to disclose material information...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases