1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 210 Cal.App.4th
  5. 210 Cal.App.4th 184 (2012)
 

MOUNT SHASTA BIOREGIONAL ECOLOGY CENTER v. COUNTY OF SISKIYOU

No. C064930.

210 Cal.App.4th 184 (2012)

148 Cal. Rptr. 3d 195

MOUNT SHASTA BIOREGIONAL ECOLOGY CENTER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SISKIYOU et al., Defendants and Respondents. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS CO. et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

September 26, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald B. Mooney for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Thomas P. Guarino ; Abbott & Kindermann and William W. Abbott for Defendants and Respondents.

Stoel Rives , Barbara A. Brenner and Stacy E. Gillespie for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

OPINION

HULL, J. —

In November 2008, defendant Siskiyou County (County) approved a project to expand an existing wood veneer manufacturing facility owned by real party in interest Roseburg Forest Products Co. (Roseburg) in order to permit cogeneration of electricity for resale (Project). Plaintiffs Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center (MSBEC) and Weed Concerned Citizens (WCC) filed a petition for writ of mandate against the County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases