1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.Ct.
  4. 128 S.Ct.
  5. 128 S.Ct. 1830 (2008)
 

U.S. v. WILLIAMS

No. 06-694.

128 S.Ct. 1830 (2008)

553 U.S. 285

170 L.Ed.2d 650

UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. Michael WILLIAMS.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 19, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Diaz , for respondent.

Paul D. Clement , Solicitor General, Counsel of Record, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Richard J. Diaz , Counsel of Record, Ophelia M. Valls , Luis I. Guerra , Coral Gables , FL, G. Richard Strafer , Miami, FL, for respondent.

Paul D. Clement , Solicitor General, Counsel of Record, Alice S. Fisher , Assistant Attorney General, Michael R. Dreeben , Deputy Solicitor General, Deanne E. Maynard , Assistant to the Solicitor General, Deborah Watson , Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Section 2252A(a)(3)(B) of Title 18, United States Code, criminalizes, in certain specified circumstances, the pandering or solicitation of child pornography. This case presents the question whether that statute is overbroad under the First Amendment or impermissibly vague under the Due Process Clause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases