STATE v. GLISSENDORF

No. CR-13-0388-PR.

329 P.3d 1049 (2014)

235 Ariz. 147

STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Robert Charles GLISSENDORF, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

July 18, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lori J. Lefferts , Pima County Public Defender, David J. Euchner (argued), Katherine A. Estavillo , Assistant Public Defenders, Tucson, for Robert Charles Glissendorf.

Thomas C. Horne , Arizona Attorney General, Robert L. Ellman , Solicitor General, Joseph T. Maziarz (argued), Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section, Phoenix, for State of Arizona.

Chief Justice BALES authored the opinion of the Court, in which, Vice Chief Justice PELANDER, Justice BERCH, Justice BRUTINEL, and Justice TIMMER joined.


Chief Justice BALES, opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 Fifty years ago, this Court held that if the state fails to preserve evidence that is potentially exonerating, the accused might be entitled to an instruction informing the jury that it may draw an adverse inference from the state's action. See State v. Willits, 96 Ariz. 184, 191, 393 P.2d 274, 279 (1964). Today, we reaffirm this principle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases