Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Rolando Bazanes, for Appellant, Pro se.
Catherine Luft , for State of Texas.
PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Appellant Rolando Bazanes attempts to appeal from certain notations made by the trial court on Bazanes's "Motion to Modify Sentence Nunc Pro Tunc." The trial court wrote the following on Bazanes's motion: "No action. Court no longer has jurisdiction." On the proposed order Bazanes included with his motion, the trial court wrote, "Court does not have jurisdiction to rule on this motion."
On June 7, 2017, we sent a letter to Bazanes expressing our concern that we may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the trial court had not entered any appealable orders.2 See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). We informed Bazanes that unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by June 19, 2017, we would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). Bazanes filed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).