R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robin Michelle Mote seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her claim for disability insurance benefits. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (R & R) of United States Magistrate Judge Kaymani D. West, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(a) for the District of South Carolina. See R & R [ECF No. 17]. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court reverse and remand the Commissioner's final decision for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). R & R at 1, 25.
The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to the Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The Court must conduct a de novo review of those portions of the R & R to which specific objections are made, and it may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Neither party has filed objections to the R & R, and the time for doing so has expired.
After a thorough review of the record in this case, the Court finds no clear error and therefore adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's R & R [ECF No. 17]. Accordingly, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court