MITCHELL v. RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES

Case No. 5:17-cv-02534 NC.

CHARLES MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Mitchell, Plaintiff, represented by Adrian R. Bacon , Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C..

Charles Mitchell, Plaintiff, represented by Todd M. Friedman , Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, PC, Todd M. Friedman , Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. & Adrian R. Bacon , Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C..

Rash Curtis & Associates, Defendant, represented by Bryan G. Ceglio , Ellis Law Group LLP & Mark Ewell Ellis , Ellis Law Group, LLP.


SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above captioned case is referred to District Judge Lucy H. Koh to determine whether it is related to 5:16-cv-06267 LHK, Charles Mitchell v. Rash Curtis & Associates.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases