STEWART v. EVANS

Case No. 5:17-CV-00135 KGB/BD.

PHILLIP DEWAYNE STEWART, ADC #151956, Plaintiff, v. GLADYS EVANS, et al. Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 555 Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillip Dewayne Stewart, Plaintiff, Pro Se.


RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

BETH DEERE, Magistrate Judge.

I. Procedures for Filing Objections

This Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") has been sent to Judge Kristine G. Baker. You may file written objections to this Recommendation. If you file objections, they must be specific and must include the factual or legal basis for your objection. Your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk within fourteen (14) days of this Recommendation.

If no objections are filed, Judge Baker can adopt this Recommendation without independently reviewing the record. By not objecting, you may also waive any right to appeal questions of fact.

II. Discussion

On May 10, 2017, Plaintiff Phillip Dewayne Stewart, an Arkansas Department of Correction ("ADC") inmate, filed this action without the help of a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. ` 1983. (Docket entry #2) Mr. Stewart also moved to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). (#1) Because of his litigation history, however, Mr. Stewart is not eligible for IFP status in federal court absent an allegation that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury.1 Here, Mr. Stewart did not plead facts alleging imminent danger of serious physical injury, so his motion to proceed IFP was denied. (#4)

The Court allowed Mr. Stewart thirty days from May 15, 2017, to pay the $400 filing fee. (#4) Mr. Stewart was specifically cautioned that his failure to submit the filing fee could result in dismissal of his claims, without prejudice. He filed an objection to the filing fee requirement (#5), but did not submit the fee.

III. Conclusion

Mr. Stewart's claims should be DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on his failure to comply with the Court's May 15, 2017 Order requiring him to pay the filing fee on or before June 14, 2017.

FootNotes


1. The following dismissals constitute "strikes" against Mr. Stewart for purposes of determining eligibility for IFP status: Stewart v. Evans, E.D. Ark. Case No. 5:16cv81 (dismissed March 24, 2016); Stewart v. Hobbs, et al., W.D. Ark. Case No. 6:15cv6023 (dismissed Jan. 26, 2016); Stewart v. Murphy, et al., W.D. Ark. Case No. 6:14cv6077 (dismissed March 15, 2015); and Stewart v. Hobbs, et al., E.D. Ark. Case No. 5:13cv381 (dismissed Jan. 31, 2014).

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases