MILLER v. McCREIGHT

Civil Action No. 5:16-CV-023-C.

ERIC LYNN MILLER, Institutional ID No. 2020206, SID No. 3926673, Previous TDCJ Nos. 1169739, 1440389 and 1699473, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MCCREIGHT, Unit Chaplain, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Lubbock Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner Pet / Other: Civil Rights
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric Lynn Miller, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

John McCreight, Defendant, represented by Richard Huntpalmer .

David Perez, Defendant, represented by Richard Huntpalmer


ORDER

SAM R. CUMMINGS, District Judge.

The United States Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation on April 12, 2017, recommending that Plaintiff's claims against Formby Unit Chaplain John McCreight and Correctional Officer David Perez for alleged violations of his First Amendment right to freedom of religious expression and his Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection should proceed through the course of litigation. No objections have been filed.

This Court has made an independent review of the record in this case and finds that the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions should be adopted.1

It is, therefore, ORDERED:

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), the Court establishes the following schedule for this case:

1. All motions to join other parties and amend the pleadings must be filed by 3:00 p.m. on July 24, 2017.

2. All other pretrial motions, including motions for summary judgment, must be filed, with supporting briefs, by 3:00 p.m. on August 23, 2017. Any response must be filed within thirty (30) days from the date shown on the certificate of service of the motion in question.

3. All discovery must be completed by 3:00 p.m. on July 24, 2017, as follows:

(a) Defendant(s) shall disclose to Plaintiff all records of the incident forming the basis of Plaintiff's complaint, which records shall include, if applicable, but shall not be limited to the following:

(i) If Plaintiff alleges a medical claim — Plaintiff's medical records for the six-month period surrounding the incident date, which medical records shall include Plaintiff's records from any TDCJ unit at which he was given medical examination or treatment concerning the denial of medical care. (ii) If Plaintiff alleges an interference with mail — any mail records, including incoming and outgoing mail logs. (iii) Plaintiff's grievances filed for the six-month period surrounding the incident date. (iv) If an excessive force claim — all internal affairs investigation reports, witness statements, and a copy of the video, if any, which was made. Defendants may submit any sensitive or confidential information to the Court for in camera review before complying with this provision. (v) All disciplinary and classification records for the six-month period surrounding the incident date. (vi) If Plaintiff alleges a medical/work claim — all work assignments and logs in addition to the medical and disciplinary records required above. (vii) If Plaintiff alleges any other claim — all records pertaining to his claim.

(b) All parties shall disclose the following:

(i) The name and, if known, the address or employment station of each person likely to have information that bears significantly on any claim or defense. (ii) As to each person named in response to paragraph (3)(b)(i) above, a brief summary of the substance of the information known by the person.

There shall be no further discovery without leave of the Court.

4. This Court has elected to opt out of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1).

5. Counsel and unrepresented parties are referred to the Local Rules of the Northern District of Texas, the Civil Justice Cost and Delay Reduction Plan of the Northern District of Texas, and the Local Rules of this Court.

All parties will be notified by separate order of the date of trial and the date for filing the proposed pretrial order.

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The Court notes that Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief and claims for return or replacement of allegedly confiscated property, retaliation, supervisory liability, and RLUIPA violations were dismissed by order entered on January 25, 2017. See Docs. 22, 23.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases