1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ROYAL v. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
 

ROYAL v. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY

No. 2010-3190.

CHONG H. ROYAL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: March 18, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CHONG H. ROYAL , of Watsonville, California, pro se.

DEVIN A. WOLAK , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for respondent. With him on the brief were TONY WEST , Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON , Director, and REGINALD T. BLADES, JR. , Assistant Director.

Before NEWMAN, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is nonprecedential

PER CURIAM.

Chong H. Royal petitions for review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") that denied her request for corrective action sought in her Individual Right of Action ("IRA") appeal under the Whistleblower Protection Act, 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8). See Royal v. Dep't of Army, Docket No. SF-1221-09-0670-W-1, slip op. at 2 (M.S.P.B. July 20, 2010) ("Final Order"). For...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases