1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 826 N.W.2d
  5. 826 N.W.2d 369 (2013)
 

STATE v. BRERETON

No. 2010AP1366-CR.

826 N.W.2d 369 (2013)

345 Wis.2d 563

2013 WI 17

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James G. BRERETON, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 6, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs and oral argument by Matthew S. Pinix , Milwaukee.

For the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was argued by Daniel J. O'Brien , assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was J.B. Van Hollen , attorney general.

PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J.

¶ 1 This is a review of a published decision of the court of appeals1 that affirmed the decision of the Circuit Court for Walworth County2 denying defendant James G. Brereton's motion to suppress evidence obtained through monitoring by a global positioning system (GPS) device installed on Brereton's vehicle. The installation and monitoring of Brereton's vehicle was accomplished...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases