The court correctly denied defendant's suppression motion, without granting a hearing. Defendant failed to allege facts sufficient to demonstrate that an aerosol can, allegedly used as a weapon, was recovered from her person or from any place in which she had a legitimate expectation of privacy (see People v Ramirez-Portoreal,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. MASCALL
1831/10, 2884A, 87/11, 2884.
146 A.D.3d 689 (2017)
2017 NY Slip Op 00559
46 N.Y.S.3d 839
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SHANEQUA MASCALL, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 26, 2017.
Decided January 26, 2017.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.