Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant, his former employer, alleging that his employment was terminated in violation of Executive Law § 296 based on his sexual orientation and in retaliation for his complaints about gender and sexual orientation discrimination in the workplace. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, submitting evidence that it had a legitimate,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.