1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 95 A.D.3d
  5. 95 A.D.3d 464 (2012)
 

ARAMARINE BROKERAGE, INC. v. HALL, ESTILL, HARDWICK, GABLE, GOLDEN & NELSON, P.C.

Nos. 7548, 650631/11.

95 A.D.3d 464 (2012)

944 N.Y.S.2d 499

2012 NY Slip Op 3533

ARAMARINE BROKERAGE, INC., Respondent, v. HALL, ESTILL, HARDWICK, GABLE, GOLDEN & NELSON, P.C., Respondent, and EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 3, 2012.

Plaintiff, an insurance broker, seeks to recover for legal malpractice arising out of defendant law firms' successive representation of it in connection with an underlying federal action against a group of insurers (the CGU insurers). In the federal action, the CGU insurers moved for, inter alia, summary judgment on their counterclaims for a return of insurance brokerage commissions paid in connection with premiums subsequently ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases