1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DELLAQUILA v. WEINSTOCK
 

DELLAQUILA v. WEINSTOCK

No. A-5268-10T4.

WENDY DELLAQUILA AND MICHAEL DELLAQUILA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BENDIT WEINSTOCK, P.A., PETER I. BERGE, ESQUIRE AND ABBOTT S. BROWN, ESQUIRE, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 8, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark J. Molz argued the cause for appellants (Law Offices of Mark J. Molz, attorney; Justin Van Dyke , on the brief).

Dennis J. Drasco argued the cause for respondents (Lum, Drasco & Positan, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Drasco , of counsel and on the brief; Arthur M. Owens , on the brief).

Before Judges Cuff, Lihotz and Waugh.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Wendy Dellaquila and Michael Dellaquila, appeal from a Law Division order awarding summary judgment in favor of defendants, Bendit Weinstock, P.A., and two of its licensed New Jersey attorneys, Peter I. Berge and Abbott S. Brown, who plaintiffs hired to provide legal representation in their pursuit of medical negligence claims. Plaintiffs' legal malpractice action alleged defendants, when they initiated the medical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases