1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 824 N.W.2d
  5. 824 N.W.2d 341 (2012)
 

MOTOKAZIE! INC. v. RICE COUNTY

No. A12-0735.

824 N.W.2d 341 (2012)

MOTOKAZIE! INC., et al., Appellants, v. RICE COUNTY, Minnesota, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 17, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack Y. Perry , Diane Bratvold , Jason R. Asmus , Briggs & Morgan, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellants.

Scott T. Anderson , Tessa S. Kowalski , John P. Edison , Ratwik, Roszak & Maloney, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by HOOTEN, Presiding Judge; PETERSON, Judge; and HUSPENI, Judge.

OPINION

HOOTEN, Judge.

Appellant Motokazie! Inc., sought to build a motorsports facility in Rice County that would include land uses not allowed under county zoning laws. Motokazie and co-appellant Portinga Brothers LLC (Portinga) applied for a text amendment to Rice County Zoning Ordinance (RCZO) § 507.05(I) so that the uses they desired could be conditionally permitted. The Rice County Board of Commissioners (the board) considered the proposal and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases