1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DOE v. BRUNO
 

DOE v. BRUNO

No. 3:17 CV 217 (JAM).

JANE DOE, v. RICHARD BRUNO.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

April 20, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jane Doe, Plaintiff, represented by Jonathan J. Einhorn , Law Office of Jonathan J. Einhorn.

Richard Bruno, Defendant, represented by Bryan P. Fiengo , Suisman, Shapiro, Wool, Brennan Gray & Greenberg, P.C..

RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY

On February 14, 2017, plaintiff Jane Doe filed her complaint (Dkt. #1) against defendant Richard Bruno and garnishees Domco LLC, Domco II LLC, and Kem Bruno (also known as Kem Curtin). Plaintiff has initiated this action pursuant to 18 U.S...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases