1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. WICK v. TWILIO INC.
 

WICK v. TWILIO INC.

Case No. C16-914RSL.

NOAH WICK on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS TWILIO INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

February 23, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Noah Wick, Plaintiff, represented by June P. Hoidal , ZIMMERMAN REED LLP, pro hac vice.

Noah Wick, Plaintiff, represented by Mark Adam Griffin , KELLER ROHRBACK & Karin Bornstein Swope , KELLER ROHRBACK.

Twilio, Inc, Defendant, represented by Dylan L. Jacobs , JONES DAY, pro hac vice, Michael B. Hazzard , JONES DAY, pro hac vice, Sarah C. Pomeroy , JONES DAY, pro hac vice & Duncan Calvert Turner , BADGLEY MULLINS TURNER PLLC.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on defendant's motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 (Dkt. #38). For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and denies the motion.

II...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases