1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. EXERGEN CORPORATION v. KAZ USA, INC.
 

EXERGEN CORPORATION v. KAZ USA, INC.

Civil Action No. 13-10628.

EXERGEN CORPORATION v. KAZ USA, INC.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

September 3, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Exergen Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Kerry L. Timbers , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Robert M. Asher , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Brandon T. Scruggs , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Joel R. Leeman , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP & Sharona H. Sternberg , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP.

KAZ USA, Inc., Defendant, represented by Pierre R. Yanney , Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Stephen Underwood , Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Wesley A. Horner , Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP & Dana A. Zakarian , Nystrom Beckman & Paris LLP.

KAZ USA, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Pierre R. Yanney , Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Stephen Underwood , Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Wesley A. Horner , Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP & Dana A. Zakarian , Nystrom Beckman & Paris LLP.

Exergen Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Kerry L. Timbers , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Robert M. Asher , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Brandon T. Scruggs , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Joel R. Leeman , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP & Sharona H. Sternberg , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP.

KAZ USA, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Pierre R. Yanney , Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Stephen Underwood , Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Wesley A. Horner , Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP & Dana A. Zakarian , Nystrom Beckman & Paris LLP.

Exergen Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Kerry L. Timbers , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Robert M. Asher , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Brandon T. Scruggs , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Joel R. Leeman , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP & Sharona H. Sternberg , Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON KAZ'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT.

Plaintiff Exergen Corporation accuses defendant Kaz USA, Inc., of infringing 17 claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,292,685 (the '685 patent) and 7,787,938 (the '938 patent). As described in previous iterations of summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases