1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MILO & GABBY, LLC v. AMAZON.COM, INC.
 

MILO & GABBY, LLC v. AMAZON.COM, INC.

Case No. C13-1932RSM.

MILO & GABBY, LLC, and KAREN KELLER, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

September 2, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milo & Gabby, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by John E Whitaker , WHITAKER LAW GROUP, Timothy J Billick , MANN LAW GROUP & Philip P Mann , MANN LAW GROUP.

Karen Keller, Plaintiff, represented by John E Whitaker , WHITAKER LAW GROUP, Timothy J Billick , MANN LAW GROUP & Philip P Mann , MANN LAW GROUP.

Amazon.com Inc, Defendant, represented by Alexandra H Moss , DURIE TANGRI LLP, Daralyn J. Durie , Durie Tangri LLP, Mark A Lemley , DURIE TANGRI LLP, Nathan C Brunette , STOEL RIVES, Brian C Park , STOEL RIVES & Vanessa Soriano Power , STOEL RIVES.

Da Fang Sun, Defendant, Pro Se.

Chongqin World First Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd, also known as Wotefusi, Defendant, Pro Se.

T Liu, also known as Bingo Deal, Defendant, Pro Se.

FAC System, also known as FAC System LLC, Defendant, Pro Se.

Dingding Zou, also known as Happy Sunday, Defendant, Pro Se.

Qiumei Zhang, Defendant, Pro Se.

Charlotte Xia, Defendant, Pro Se.

Nimble Joy, Defendant, Pro Se.

Amanialarashi2165, Defendant, Pro Se.

Monaqo, Defendant, Pro Se.

Amazon.com Inc, Counter Claimant, represented by Alexandra H Moss , DURIE TANGRI LLP, Daralyn J. Durie , Durie Tangri LLP, Mark A Lemley , DURIE TANGRI LLP, Nathan C Brunette , STOEL RIVES, Brian C Park , STOEL RIVES & Vanessa Soriano Power , STOEL RIVES.

Karen Keller, Counter Defendant, represented by Timothy J Billick , MANN LAW GROUP & Philip P Mann , MANN LAW GROUP.

Milo & Gabby, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Timothy J Billick , MANN LAW GROUP & Philip P Mann , MANN LAW GROUP.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Amazon's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs. Dkt. #53. Defendant argues that it is entitled to fees and costs as the prevailing party under both the Copyright...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases