1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ZYSMAN v. ZANETT INC.
 

ZYSMAN v. ZANETT INC.

No. C-13-02813 YGR (DMR).

MAYA ZYSMAN, Plaintiff(s), v. ZANETT INC. ET AL, Defendant(s).

United States District Court, N.D. California.

March 31, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maya Zysman, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Zanett Inc., Defendant, represented by Justin Heath Jenkins , Winthrop and Weinstine, P.A., Andrew Stephen Williams , Barger & Wolen LLP, David A Davenport , Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. & Vivian I. Orlando , Barger & Wolen LLP.

IT Commonwealth, Defendant, represented by Justin Heath Jenkins , Winthrop and Weinstine, P.A., Andrew Stephen Williams , Barger & Wolen LLP, David A Davenport , Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. & Vivian I. Orlando , Barger & Wolen LLP.

Claudio M. Guazzoni, CEO, Defendant, represented by Justin Heath Jenkins , Winthrop and Weinstine, P.A., Andrew Stephen Williams , Barger & Wolen LLP, David A Davenport , Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. & Vivian I. Orlando , Barger & Wolen LLP.

Dennis Harkins, CFO, Defendant, represented by Justin Heath Jenkins , Winthrop and Weinstine, P.A., Andrew Stephen Williams , Barger & Wolen LLP, David A Davenport , Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. & Vivian I. Orlando , Barger & Wolen LLP.

Kim Edward Elverud, Defendant, represented by Justin Heath Jenkins , Winthrop and Weinstine, P.A., Andrew Stephen Williams , Barger & Wolen LLP, David A Davenport , Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. & Vivian I. Orlando , Barger & Wolen LLP.

Sumner Harrington Ltd., Defendant, represented by Justin Heath Jenkins , Winthrop and Weinstine, P.A., Andrew Stephen Williams , Barger & Wolen LLP, David A Davenport , Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. & Vivian I. Orlando , Barger & Wolen LLP.

ORDER RE: EX PARTE DISCOVERY LETTERS [DOCKET NO. 59 AND 60]

DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.

Before the court are two ex parte discovery letters filed by pro se Plaintiff Maya Zysman and Defendants Zanett Inc., Claudio Guazzoni, Dennis Harkins, Ed Elverud, and Sumner Harrington, Ltd. (See Pl.'s Mot. [Docket No. 59] and Defs.' Mot. [Docket No. 60].) Plaintiff seeks to compel responses to four specific requests for production of documents ("RFP" or ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases