TRANXITION, INC. v. LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.

Nos. 2015-1907, 2015-1941, 2015-1958.

TRANXITION, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, MICRO FOCUS SOFTWARE, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: November 16, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARTHUR STEVEN BEEMAN , Arent Fox LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JOEL MUCHMORE ; DAYNA JEAN CHRISTIAN , Immix Law Group PC, Portland, OR.

TODD ERIC LANDIS , Vinson & Elkins LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for all defendants-appellees. Lenovo (United States) Inc. also represented by ERIC JOSEPH KLEIN ; FRED WILLIAMS , Austin, TX.

STERLING A. BRENNAN , Maschoff Brennan Laycock Gilmore Israelsen & Wright, Irvine, CA, for defendant-appellee Micro Focus Software, Inc. Also represented by LANNIE REX SEARS , Salt Lake City, UT.

Before PROST, Chief Judge, REYNA and CHEN, Circuit Judges.


This disposition is nonprecedential

Tranxition, Inc. ("Tranxition") appeals from a final decision of the United States Court for the District of Oregon finding that all claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,728,877 ("'877 patent") and U.S. Patent No. 7,346,766 ("'766 patent") are invalid because they are directed to ineligible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases