1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY v. MacDERMID PRINTING SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.
 

E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY v. MacDERMID PRINTING SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.

No. 2015-1777.

E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. MacDERMID PRINTING SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: August 19, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CHARLES E. LIPSEY , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by HOWARD WARREN LEVINE , AARON GLEATON CLAY , Washington, DC; MARY K. FERGUSON , Boston, MA; JENNIFER SWAN , JEFFREY DANIEL SMYTH , Palo Alto, CA; MATTHEW JOSEPH RICCIARDI , CHARLES D. OSSOLA , Vinson & Elkins LLP, Washington, DC.

JOHN RICHARD HORVACK, JR. , Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey LLP, New Haven, CT, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by FATIMA LAHNIN .

Before PROST, PLAGER and LOURIE,

This disposition is nonprecedential.

E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. ("DuPont") appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting summary judgment that claims 1, 6, 22, 30, 33, 36, 39-41, and 48 of U.S. Patent 6,773,859 ("the '859 patent") are invalid as obvious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases