1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 659 F.3d
  5. 659 F.3d 1369 (2011)
 

RETRACTABLE TECHS. v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND CO.

No. 2010-1402.

659 F.3d 1369 (2011)

RETRACTABLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Thomas J. Shaw, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 31, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy W. Hardin , Locke, Lord, Bissell & Liddell, LLP, of Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were Cynthia Keely Timms and Mark R. Backofen .

William F. Lee , Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale, and Dorr, LLP, of Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Lisa J. Pirozzolo ; and William G. McElwain and Heath A. Brooks , of Washington, DC.

O'MALLEY, Circuit Judge, dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by Plaintiffs-Appellees, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Defendant-Appellant. The petition for rehearing was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and the response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases